A Few Things Your Sport Diving Instructor May Not Have Told You About Deeper Diving

by Larry "Harris" Taylor, Ph.D.

This is an electronic reprint of an article that appeared in SOURCES (Nov/Dec. 1991,p. 63-68; THE BEST OF SOURCES, p. 37-41). It has also appeared on numerous web sites and computer bulletin boards. This material is copyrighted and all rights are retained by the author. This material is made available as a service to the diving community by the author and may be distributed for any non-commercial or Not-For-Profit use.

There is an incredible fascination with diving on intact shipwrecks. In the quest for this thrill of diving unmolested wrecks, some divers in the Great Lakes are diving on compressed air in the vicinity of 200 Ft or deeper. A few of these "sport divers" have taken years to develop skills, technique and equipment that allow them to survive these penetrations into that deep, dark, cold and silent world that lies beneath the sport diving limit of 100 - 130 Ft. A few are truly highly skilled diving adventurers. Some would call them pioneers. Others would call them something less dignified. It is true that some walk with a noticeable limp, stand a little funny (numbness in the legs), have difficulty remembering things or seem to have somehow slowed their thinking and speech processes. None-the-less, many of these diving adventurers have seen splendors that not many will ever know. Other diving "adventurers" have found unique pains and death.

Divers new to our sport often do not realize that the successful deep diver has generally taken a decade or more to develop the necessary skills, equipment and technique to survive consistently this deeper diving. Make no mistake, some of these divers are highly skilled and physically fit. That exceptional proficiency, however, was not acquired in only a few days or even years. Although most are self-taught, many of these deep divers were trained when diving courses were longer and discussions on diving physics and physiology were more extensive. Thus, they have had access to information often missing in today's shorter curriculum... material that is essential to make informed risk/benefit assessments. There are distinct physiological problems associated with deep diving. Since divers do not breathe water, the physiological impairments caused by deep diving can be (and have been) life threatening. Sport "deep diving" courses are simply insufficient training for diving to depths "below the limits." Divers compelled to dive below 100 Ft should consider commercial or military dive training - depths below 100 Ft are beyond the realm of sport diving... Sport diving equipment and techniques no longer are adequate! In addition, the training agencies will not, for a variety of reasons, address the question of training for diving below 100-130 Ft.

There are those who earn their livelihood diving at depths below 100 feet. Many of these commercial divers would consider sport divers foolhardy for diving under conditions a professional would consider to be too dangerous. Note that commercial operations are conducted under federal/state OSHA regulations. Recreational and scientific diving are specifically exempted from these regulations. (Scientific diving, however, operates under similar guidelines promulgated by the American Academy of Underwater Sciences.) Whenever any employer/employee relationship exists, these rules do apply. This means even if the diver is volunteering services and equipment, non-recreational, non-scientific diving may be subject to federal/state occupational safety regulations. These federal regulations decree that all dives more than 130 Ft (some states have tougher regulations; Michigan, for example, places the limit at 100 feet) or any dive requiring decompression be conducted with a tender for each diver, a stand-by safety diver, a surface decompression chamber on the dive site, and an adequate supply of breathing gas for the diver, the stand-by diver and the recompression chamber. The law specifies that the vessel used as a diving platform be Coast Guard approved and commanded by a Coast Guard licensed operator. The diving must be controlled by a designated "diving supervisor" who must insure that all OSHA regulations are met during the dive operation. There are additional requirements specifying the first aid equipment, including oxygen, that must be on the dive site. The law also requires that a complete time/event log be maintained. The British government mandates that all diving more than 165 Ft under their jurisdiction be done on mixed gas. In today's liability conscious society, most legitimate diving contractors will exceed the minimum OSHA standards.

Since federal diving safety regulations prohibit non-recreational scuba operations below 130 Ft, commercial/scientific diving is often a single diver down mode with a tended tether, surface supplied breathing gas and some sort of dry face mask/helmet equipped with hard wire communications. This equipment significantly increases the safety of the diver. The communication system allows the surface support personnel to monitor the diver's psychological and physiological status. Surface control of the entire dive operation minimizes task loading on the diver. This insures that potential life threatening/saving decisions are made by narcosis free surface support personnel. The dry mask/helmet provides mechanical and thermal protection for the diver's head and face. More importantly, it gives the diver a dry atmosphere that is breathable if a blackout occurs.

Commercial operations must be conducted with redundant equipment and personnel. It is this contingency for the unexpected that increases diver safety. This redundancy is most often missing in deep sport diving excursions. (This equipment is beyond the finances and training of most in the sport diving community.) Thus, the deep sport diving adventurer has very little, if any, margin for human error.

There are significant physiological problems in deeper diving. These include:

RISK: REAL OR THEORETICAL? There is a wreck, the Gunilda, that lies at 256 Ft in the Great Lakes. Since it has historical significance and lies close to the Canadian shore, the diving activity on this vessel has been monitored. To date, there have been 26 divers who have visited this wreck. Twelve of these divers (operating under commercial-type protocols) account for 136 dives on this vessel. Within this group, 1 dive required treatment for severe decompression sickness (to a diver who had 34 dives on this wreck) and there were no fatalities. There have been 14 sport divers on compressed air that have accounted for 33 dives. Of these 33 dives, 9 (27%) have resulted in severe decompression sickness that required chamber treatment, 5 dives (15%) were aborted due to severe narcosis that required the diver to be rescued, and there were two fatalities (6%). In addition, two of these surviving divers, one from each group, have subsequently died on another deep wreck.

The population of sport divers who visited this wreck is small. These divers have seen an awesome spectacle. Not all divers have been visibly injured. However, there were two sport diving fatalities and a high percentage of sport divers requiring treatment for severe decompression sickness. It would appear from this admittedly small survey that diving to 250 Ft on compressed air does, indeed, pose a significant risk to the recreational diver.

It is most interesting to listen to these deep diving adventurers post- treatment. One diver, after leaving the chamber against medical advice, stated that he had experienced "no narcosis problem" at 256 Ft on compressed air. (Remember, short-term amnesia is a common after effect.) This diver went on to state that the bends had produced only a "mild" pain. (Perhaps the "mildness" of the pain could be attributed to the morphine that was administered to this diver by the emergency medical team on the flight to the chamber.)

FINAL THOUGHTS: No one has the right to restrict your personal style of recreational diving. Lee Somers, Ph.D., Diving Safety Officer for the University of Michigan and one of the Founding Fathers of our sport, calls this "THE RIGHT TO DIvE!" Dan Orr, Training Co-ordinator for DAN, calls deep sport diving "an exercise in natural selection". The decision to risk life and spinal cord for the sake of recreational adventure rests with each diver. This risk (loss of life or maybe only a slight compromise in mental faculties, the ability to walk, go to the bathroom unassisted or to have sex) / benefit (adventure, thrill, status, or fame) decision should, however, be based on knowledge and evaluation of the actual risks incurred and not solely on the perceived status of survival.

I once asked a very highly skilled and well known Great Lakes deep sport diver about diving to extreme depths on compressed air without the redundancy of commercial equipment and personnel. My question, "What do you do alone at 250 Ft under the influence of narcosis to deal with an equipment emergency?" His answer, "I die!" Enough said! The decision to dive to "adventurer depths" rests with the individual diver. Choose wisely!

Acknowledgment

The author wishes to express his gratitude to Karl Huggins, Dan Orr and Lee Somers for hours of stimulating conversation about this topic. In particular, he would like to thank Karl for testing the capacity of his answering machine with an impromptu discussion on the deep divers of the Gunilda.

References:

  1. Bennett, P. Dovenbarger, J. & Corson, K. "Etiology And Treatment Of Air Diving Accidents", in Bennett, P. & Moon, R. (Eds.) DIVING ACCIDENT MANAGEMENT, Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society, Bethesda, MD. 1990, p. 12-22.

  2. Bove, A. & Davis, J. (Eds.) DIVING MEDICINE, 2 nd Edition, W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA. 1990.

  3. Edmonds, C. Lowry, C. & Pennefather, J. DIVING AND SUBAQUATIC MEDICINE, 2 nd Edition, Diving Medical Centre, Mosman, Australia, 1981.

  4. Exley, S. BASIC CAVE DIVING, NSS-CDS, Jacksonville FL. 1979.

  5. Gorbett, D. "Straight Talk From A Commercial Diver", Lake Superior Newsletter, Number 10, February-April, 1990, p. 1-3.

  6. Hill, R.K. "Rubber Rulers", Sources, July/August, 1989, p. 37-38.

  7. Kindwall, E. & Cumming, J. "Decompression Survey Report", guest feature in Bove, F. "Diving Medicine", Skin Diver, March, 1989. p.32-36.

  8. Monaghan, R. "Dying By Pieces-Soft Tissue Damage In Divers", Sources, Sept/Oct, 1990, p. 48-51.

  9. Schilling, C. (Ed.) THE PHYSICIAN'S GUIDE TO DIVING MEDICINE, Plenum Press, New York, NY. 1984.

  10. Somers, L. "The Depth and Gas Delemma" In Press, NAUI IQ 1991 Proceedings.

  11. Somers, L. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARD FOR SCIENTIFIC DIVING OPERATIONS, University Of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 1990.

  12. Somers, L. "The Right To DIvE", Unpublished Manuscript, 1990.

  13. State Of Michigan Departments Of Public Health And Labor, "A Standard For Diving Operations", Michigan State Department Of Public Health, Lansing, MI. 1979.

  14. U.S. Coast Guard, "Provisions For Commercial Diving Operations", Federal Register, 43, (222), November 16, 1978 as reproduced in Appendix D of: Malatich, J. & Tucker, W. TRICKS OF THE TRADE FOR DIVERS, Cornell Maritime Press, Centreville, MD. 1986.

  15. U.S. Department Of Labor, "Educational/Scientific Diving Standards", Federal Register, 50 (6), June, 1985, p. 1046-1050 as supplied by the AAUS.

About The Author:

Larry "Harris" Taylor, Ph.D. is a biochemist and scuba instructor at the University of Michigan. He has authored more than 100 scuba related articles. His personal dive library (See Alert Diver, Mar/Apr, 1997, p. 54) is considered by many as one of the best recreational sources of information in North America.


Index
Altitude Bash Battle Buoyancy Deep Dive
EAN Gas Calc Gas Laws Knife Mixed Gas
Not Cold O2 clean Psalm River Snow Pike
Dive Links


Last updated 27 July 97